Text size Smaller Larger Text colour Black White Background colour Black Yellow Pale pink White
Default settingsClose More about accessibility

 

Teacher Association UK
In this section
Newsletter Samples
187 Young Learners in Language Schools
186 Ten reasons why … it's good to write
185 Why classroom research?
184 Setting up a voluntary workshop programme
183 What makes a good teacher
182 The EFL teacher as a humaniser
181 Good ELT practice
180 Language philosophy and language teaching
179 The private self and literacy - a synopsis
178 Learning facts in works of fiction
177 Cavalry attacks or long sieges
176 A reading problem in secondary schools
175 Contronomy in English
174 Fulfilling the promise of professional development
173 Searching for authentic materials
172 New wine in an old bottle: innovative EFL classrooms in China
171 Recycling in ESP
170 Teaching postgraduate English as international communication
169 Help! I've been asked to teach a class on ESP
168 Ageism in TESOL
167 The why and how of poster presentations
166 A Disabled Teacher Teaching Disabled Learners
164 ELT in India: 400 years and still going strong
163 Not seen and not heard?
162 Around the IATEFL World
161 It's not just what you say ...
160 The TEFL Writer's lament: the end?
159 Howl: A Modest Proposal revisited
Special Needs: a challenge neglected by ELT
157 Teachers as textbook evaluators: an Interdisciplinary Checklist
156 Reason not the need: Shakespeare in ELT
155 A Brief History of English Language Teaching in China
154 How's your grammar today?
149 Swimming with the tide
149 Managing professionalisation or 'Hey, that's my development!'
147 News as EFL Teaching Material
146 Discipline
145 Affect and the cost of correctness
149 Continuous Professional Development
145 Classroom politics, power and self-direction
144 Multimedia Madness
144 Web-sites on the Internet for ELT: a closer look at what they contain
143 To What Extent Can Teachers Influence Their Students' Opinions?
140 English in India
139 Learner Autonomy: The Cross Cultural Question
137 Classroom Aroma
136 How do second language speakers correct themselves?

Why Classroom Research

John Field, jcf1000@dircon.co.uk
First published in Voices 185, June/July 2005.


John Field is Co-ordinator of the IATEFL Research SIG. He currently teaches at Birkbeck College London and is the author of several books on psycholinguistics.

Nothing is worse than teaching that has stagnated. It is bad for the teacher, bad for the learners and bad for the institution. Practitioners get out of ruts by reflecting on their teaching and asking serious questions about its impact upon the learner. What they discover may sometimes be painful or challenge deeply-held beliefs, but it leads to renewal and change. It is perhaps unfortunate that we give the forbidding label ‘research’ to this process of enquiry and reflection. But, whatever we call it, teacher-led research is not a hobby, nor a way of pushing back the frontiers of knowledge. It is a professional duty. Only by assessing what we are doing from time to time can we be sure that it is right—right for our individual style of teaching and right for the group of learners that we are currently dealing with. Some teachers may indeed wish to circulate research findings to colleagues or to publish them in journals. But many do not: they might just want to investigate specific circumstances: a specific class with a specific teacher attempting to put across a specific language point using specific materials.

Another compelling argument is that, by conducting classroom research, teachers free themselves from the constraints of tradition and precept. Far too much of our practice derives not from our own insights but from the instructions we were once given by trainers, inspectors and directors of studies—and for that matter, from the theories freely dispensed by academic researchers. We need to recognise that much of what passes as good practice in ELT has no scientific evidence to back it up: it is simply the result of an amalgam of experience, myth and wishful thinking. Let us, instead, try to find out for ourselves what works for us and what does not. Classroom research is indeed empowering, liberating teachers from the prescriptions of others.

There should be no suggestion that teachers make less effective researchers than academics. The fact is that much academic research is conducted by an alien presence in the classroom. Whether that presence is simply an observer or somebody who takes over the class temporarily, it is not part of the normal everyday learning context. The situation is an unnatural one. On this analysis, the teacher is in a better position to conduct research than the professional researcher, and the research findings of teachers may in some cases be more reliable than those of academics. The most dependable insights into language teaching and learning may well in future come from studies undertaken by insiders who know and understand the dynamics of the classroom, rather than by outsiders who form conclusions on the basis of a brief visit.

Classroom research by EFL teachers is far more widespread than many commentators realise. Indeed, in some parts of the world there is now a national requirement that secondary teachers incorporate small-scale research projects into their practice. Nevertheless, the activity can be a lonely affair for the teacher involved. It can also be frustrating, with teachers feeling that they lack the knowledge of appropriate methods and approaches that would enable them to make informed decisions. For most teachers, time is a scarce commodity; and nothing is worse than committing some of it to a research project without any certainty that the findings of the project will be valid and can be trusted.

So teacher-researchers need a forum where they can discuss problems of classroom research, share their findings, reflect on what they have discovered and exchange ideas about the design of the projects they have undertaken. That is the function of the biennial TDTR series of conferences, run jointly by IATEFL Research and TD SIGs. Since 1992, they have provided practitioners and academic researchers with the opportunity to explore the ways in which teacher-led research in ELT can lead to personal and professional development.

(The TDTR 2005 conference will be held in Santiago de Chile, 22–24 September; see Calendar of events for details. Ed.)

Further reading

  1. Field, J. 1997. ‘Key concept: classroom research’. ELT Journal 51/2.
  2. Low, G. 1996. ‘Validating research questionnaires: the value of common sense’. Research News, 9. Whitstable: IATEFL Research SIG. Reprinted in A. McLean (ed.). SIG Selections 1997. Whitstable: IATEFL.